Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:31:53 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Putinas Piliponis <putinas.piliponis@icnspot.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system lockup - ata spurious interrupts - somehow updated Message-ID: <405DB569.7040009@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <001c01c40f41$34faf790$1e64a8c0@spotripoli.local> References: <405B9DCD.9040907@6by9.org> <0a0c01c40e90$2d86e070$32cba1cd@science1> <000401c40f33$86ce9210$1e64a8c0@spotripoli.local> <405D7D7F.3090209@DeepCore.dk> <001c01c40f41$34faf790$1e64a8c0@spotripoli.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Putinas Piliponis wrote: > I hope what sooner or later, you will have such hw. I wish I could provide > it, but I am not that rich. Nor am I or it would be here already :/ > One more question, with today kernel, vmstat -i doesn't list my second > sata controller as using irq at all. > I see what ata0 and ata1 are reporting using irq, but ata2 and ata3 is > using only > port. Does it mean, what my hardware generates interrupt even if it's > not asked > for ? No, its because interrupts are only listed on the two master devices (ie those on irq 14 & 15) for hysterical reasons. On PCI attached devices the irq from the atapciN device is used for both channels. -- -Søren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?405DB569.7040009>