Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:38:26 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com> To: dave <dmehler26@woh.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usr data/fax modem under 5.4 Message-ID: <42D6A312.6090004@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <002101c587fc$31d10f20$0200a8c0@satellite> References: <002101c587fc$31d10f20$0200a8c0@satellite>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
dave wrote: >I've enabled sio2 and set it's irq to 2, also 4, 5, and >9, all of which give me the error: >configured irq x not in bitmap of probed irq's 0 >under dmesg output i see the sio2 port, it's i/o address, and the fact that >fbsd sees the modem's uart as a 16550a which again if i remember right tells >me that i've got the sio2 port and i/o right, just the irq is wrong. Did i >miss something? > > I'm no expert on this, but no-one else seems to be either :-) Are you sure it doesn't work despite the message? With an on-motherboard sio port I get sio1: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A and the port works just fine. The "not in probed bitmaps" is some ACPI related cruft, IIUC. I do, however, see the IRQ. I do have hint.sio.1.at="isa" hint.sio.1.port="0x3F8" hint.sio.1.irq="4" in device.hints, but I'm not really sure it was necessary. Might well be for an actual ISA card, though. Are you sure that none of the irq hints you tried showed you the IRQ in the COM port line? I was distracted by the not in bitmap message for a while until I twigged that the thing *was* working. --Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42D6A312.6090004>