Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:10:12 +0200 From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: autoconf failure Message-ID: <200710051210.14448.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <004401c80730$e4aa4d90$88010c0a@dublin.wbtsystems.com> References: <20071003233449.GA46401@demeter.hydra> <004401c80730$e4aa4d90$88010c0a@dublin.wbtsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 05 October 2007 11:19:55 Barry Byrne wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chad Perrin > > Sent: 04 October 2007 00:35 > > To: FreeBSD Questions > > Subject: autoconf failure > > > > First, portversion reports as follows: > > > > # portversion -v|grep -v = > > autoconf-2.53_4 < needs updating (port has 2.61_2) > > autoconf-2.59_3 < needs updating (port has 2.61_2) > > > > Then, /usr/ports/UPDATING fails to note anything about the > > new autoconf > > version other than the following: > > > > The ports tree has been migrated to the latest version of autoconf, > > 2.61. Versions 2.53 and 2.59 were declared obsolete and removed. > > > Had the same thought's here - don't know for certain that it's the right > thing to do, but I did: > > cd /usr/ports/devel/autoconf261 > make deinstall > make reinstall It's simpler then that: pkg_delete -f autoconf-2.5[39]* -- Mel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200710051210.14448.fbsd.questions>