Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 08:20:15 -0000 From: "Greg Hennessy" <Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net> To: "'Kevin K.'" <freebsd-pf@magma.ca>, "'LI Xin'" <delphij@delphij.net> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: RE: PF & Windows Vista Message-ID: <001301c74a90$cbef6b80$63ce4280$@Hennessy@nviz.net> In-Reply-To: <005301c74a04$b8528990$28f79cb0$@ca> References: E1HD4Bj-000D25-00.msgs_for_me-mail-ru@f30.mail.ru <859855731.20070206155625@mail.ru> <002501c749f3$bb1a1dc0$314e5940$@ca> <45C885B3.3000508@delphij.net> <004601c749f5$8dd0b930$a9722b90$@ca> <005301c74a04$b8528990$28f79cb0$@ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'd like to know if anyone else has experienced something similar with > Vista and their firewall. I realize it may be something with Vista, but this > issue seems to be related with PF firewalls and Vista. > I have ran (and am running ) vista with CTCP enabled and disabled through PF just fine. Silly question, are all your tcp keep state rules establishing state on flags S/SA only ? What's the default block log all rule telling you regarding the connection ? Have you tcpdumped an incoming session from that system through both ingress and egress interfaces to see what's happening ? Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001301c74a90$cbef6b80$63ce4280$>