Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 18:56:09 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed Message-ID: <esk9vq$uhh$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig74CCD9E6CBE85E0B8E53451E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Artem Kuchin wrote: > I used unixbenchmark for measure overall perfomance of three machines o= f > different generations and with different OS versions. See for your self= and > compare results with machine cost. > Hope this will be usefull for someone. Several things: a) It looks like your message was weirdly truncated - whole "rectangles" of text are missing from the results on the right-hand-side. Maybe you copied it through Excel? b) I submitted a patch for unixbench than enables execl benchmark on amd64, it should be in the ports tree by now. c) It would be interesting for the general discussion if you could install a recent server-like version of Linux (e.g. CentOS, SuSE, Debian) on one of the machines you did your benchmarks on to compare results :) --------------enig74CCD9E6CBE85E0B8E53451E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7as5ldnAQVacBcgRAlTnAKCk+AjUaZy2GqpjIuStTNnTepBfSACg9QZb ICfIVxb5AZdiqx0jB7ie/No= =rRjB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig74CCD9E6CBE85E0B8E53451E--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?esk9vq$uhh$1>