Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 08:16:47 -0600 From: Pete Fritchman <petef@absolutbsd.org> To: Max <max@ecotech.com.lr> Cc: Mark Bojara <mark@mics.co.za>, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Orinoco Ap-500 or OR-500? Message-ID: <20020729081647.A47367@absolutbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <008a01c23701$2e7e9da0$04ef10ac@wireless>; from max@ecotech.com.lr on Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 02:09:32PM %2B0100 References: <Pine.LNX.4.41.0207291504060.697-100000@opium.co.za> <008a01c23701$2e7e9da0$04ef10ac@wireless>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
++ 29/07/02 14:09 +0100 - Max: | Unfortunately, we already have an orinico infra-structure in place. | Inter-operability may be an issue, I don't know. But would an AP-500 or an | OR-500 do the trick? AFAIK, the only difference between an AP-500 and an OR-500 is firmware. The OR-500 supports point-to-point stuff. We have a bunch of AP-500s and AP-1000s in place serving wireless to the area -- I think you'll be fine with an AP-500. --pete -- Pete Fritchman [petef@(databits.net|freebsd.org|wyom.net)] finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020729081647.A47367>