Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 13:49:12 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: "Yuriy Tsibizov" <Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.ru> Cc: freebsd@unixfreunde.de, ed@fxq.nl, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Regression] snd_emu10k1 doesn't work after GCC 4.2 upgrade Message-ID: <20070526134912.589eddba@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <009201c79fbd$fb3e6372$1e00000a@hhp.local> References: <009201c79fbd$fb3e6372$1e00000a@hhp.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, 26 May 2007 21:45:10 +0400 "Yuriy Tsibizov" <Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.ru> wrote: > I've re-checked this problem today and it seems to be a real gcc > regression. I had more pessimistic optimisation flags ( -O ) in my > first tests and snd_emu10k1 was running without problems. If I build > it with -O2 (default value for -CURRENT, with __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null) > it is broken (I checked it on my Audigy card and it shows different > problems from Live!, because it uses different code paths in driver). > snd_emu10kx is not broken with both -O and -O2. I can't tell for > shure, but there was no bug reports about broken snd_emu10k1 with -O2 > and old gcc. > > Yuriy > Show me the broken code. It is not that hard to isolate one if you know that it exists. Above rambling does not cut it. -- Alexander Kabaev [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGWHMYQ6z1jMm+XZYRAkqzAJ9P4R0FkFbO/Vi14ao8BC4rY6riVACeJZ6F 0vEJoIaiCtlKwlsP5aBYgXc= =0T3a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070526134912.589eddba>