Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:45:31 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: "Yuriy Tsibizov" <Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.ru> Cc: freebsd@unixfreunde.de, ed@fxq.nl, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Regression] snd_emu10k1 doesn't work after GCC 4.2 upgrade Message-ID: <20070526154531.79503c6b@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <009301c79fcd$e3040060$1e00000a@hhp.local> References: <009301c79fcd$e3040060$1e00000a@hhp.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, 26 May 2007 23:38:58 +0400 "Yuriy Tsibizov" <Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.ru> wrote: > Alexander, I'm working on it. > The only thing I can say right now, that it's -ftree-vrp that broke > the code -- building with -O -ftree-vrp makes broken binary, while -O > alone does not. > > (sorry for top-posting) Thanks. Ideally should be able to distill the case info a simple preprocessed .i file with just enough code to demonstrate the mis-compilation. I do not have any of the snd_emuXXX cards here myself. -- Alexander Kabaev [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGWI5bQ6z1jMm+XZYRAmCcAJwK9V+N+PJ4M+i0FUsagA+1ArYwMwCfUKFl ViQCYz9Y5xNy15VXggPbo5M= =lhfQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070526154531.79503c6b>