Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Ivailo Tanusheff <i.tanusheff@procreditbank.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Far routing
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0208290852250.98075-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <016101c24f2e$ad299a70$cbf810ac@sof.procreditbank.bg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
you should use tunnelling so that machines in the 10 net
think they have a direct link to the 172 net.

there are MANY tunnel methods available from IPSEC to ipip to l2tp to pptp
to netgraph etc.etc.etc.


On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have the following configuration:
> 
> <10. net>----<10.0.0.1 (FreeBSD Box1) a.b.c.d>----[INTERNET]----<x.y.z.t
> (FreeBSD box2) 172.168.0.1>---<172.168.0 net>
> I have proper nating for inbound and outbound traffic.
> How may I set the routing on the first FreeBSD box, so packets to
> 172.168 net would be forwarded to the second FreeBSD box, which NAT will
> mask them to the proper host?
> 
> Thank you in advantage,
> Ivailo Tanusheff
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0208290852250.98075-100000>