Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:01:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de> To: Alex Huppenthal <alex@aspenworks.com> Cc: Richard Hodges <rh@matriplex.com>, <freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ATM 4.3 and so on Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104051257460.6149-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de> In-Reply-To: <01d601c0bdac$ffe64700$1800a8c0@d7k>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Alex Huppenthal wrote: AH>Will this operate at all like the 'atm' setup does? Is the intent to AH>replace the HARP stack? Will we need a new 'atm' command? I think, most of this can be done with ngctl and appropriate scripts. And yes, it replaces the HARP stack (but you could run them in parallel). AH>Will FreeBSD have a device entry like hfa0 and sub devices like atm0 atm1, AH>etc associated with the PVCs? There is one interface for the physical NATM device fatm0. To do IP over PVC's this is sufficent, you don't even need netgraph. For SVCs there will be additional interfaces. AH>I can't get away from the fragmentation error. If I could, all else would be AH>adequate for the near term.. Is there anyway I can debug the existing AH>OS/driver? 4.2 is running.. albeit with a fragmentation problem. I must have AH>a solution for deployment in a few days. Even if it's an interim solution. I wonder about that problem. Who does this fragmentation? IP? This would mean it get's the wrong MTU from the ATM driver. harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.gmd.de, harti@begemot.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.33.0104051257460.6149-100000>