Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:33:26 +0200 From: Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen <jsm@FreeBSD.org> To: "Paul W. Rankin" <hello@paulwrankin.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which aarch64 release image is appropriate for the Pinebook Pro (rk3399)? Message-ID: <956ab020-adad-092a-5ee2-6c12a4f45862@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <04fcfea157f720c5c23d07831a3c3a8b@purelymail.com> References: <ff6ae8045573af60facd3d485021d5ab@purelymail.com> <dbe536ac-8956-2aa4-93f5-3f9752419d24@FreeBSD.org> <04fcfea157f720c5c23d07831a3c3a8b@purelymail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13.07.2022 08.14, Paul W. Rankin wrote: > On 2022-07-11 06:22, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen wrote: >> An official release is not really available yet, I wrote about the >> subject in the FreeBSD Journal which tries to guide towards a recent >> (mostly) official source build. The article is here >> https://freebsdfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/FreeBSD-on-the-Pinebook-Pro.pdf >> >> It has sounds pathces and panfrost and not the least a working display >> port for the panel. >> Some errors have probably sneaked in in the article please feel free >> to complain to me/ask me for details. It might also already be a >> little outdated IIRC for instance the mixer patch does not longer >> apply and is not necessary any more. > > Thanks Jesper! > > I flashed your image to the eMMC. The big problem I ran into was that > the display would corrupt on a reboot, requiring a hard reset. I > believe NetBSD have fixed this? Yes, perhaps my image by mistake does not contain the patched u-boot, I did transplant the NetBSD fix into u-boot. This should be it https://github.com/jsm222/u-boot-pinebookpro/releases, note that u-boot in ports tree has moved on, so you might simply try to use the binaries. Regards Jesper
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?956ab020-adad-092a-5ee2-6c12a4f45862>