Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 05:12:43 +0300 From: Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jailed NFS server Message-ID: <CAPSTsku7fefaJQ-whx3OecNhU%2BvLHDcRtFc=iThQY-xoN_uBxA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0685CC3A-753B-4C5B-9E15-C0565B48F885@ultra-secure.de> References: <CAPSTskvLbixeyYW9BWFR0bSfJ3%2Br59ZYHHLyJAaYFERobO6O=w@mail.gmail.com> <0685CC3A-753B-4C5B-9E15-C0565B48F885@ultra-secure.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maybe I will give unfs3 a try. However, One of the reasons I'm trying to set it up is to be able to run Tinderbox on that jail for distributed compiling. When I did a little searching about unfs3 + Tinderbox + jail, it came up with posts about problems and that such setup "does not give good results". Any feedback about such setup? Also, is such "bad performance result" also valid for all types of HPC/parallel computing run from jails so that "Just Run From Host" becomes the defaul solution in these cases? Thanks and Regards. On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de>wrote: > > Am 28.03.2012 um 22:20 schrieb Beeblebrox: > > > Is it possible to get an NFS server working from inside a Jail, where > host > > storage is on ZFS? > > > Maybe try unfs3: > > http://www.freshports.org/net/unfs3/ > > > > Regards > Rainer >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPSTsku7fefaJQ-whx3OecNhU%2BvLHDcRtFc=iThQY-xoN_uBxA>