Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 18:00:38 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Michael Meltzer <mjm@michaelmeltzer.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A modest proposal for better errno values... Message-ID: <20030514080038.GC4366@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <081901c319ab$18daa470$34f820c0@ix1x1000> References: <3EC10099.3328.197DDF3E@localhost> <081901c319ab$18daa470$34f820c0@ix1x1000>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 07:55:14PM -0400, Michael Meltzer wrote: >> #define EDOOFUS 88 /* Programming error */ > >#define E370HSSV 88 /* Programming error */ You might get this one past the suits if you can come up with an appropriate acronym (one that keeps their mind off reading it .(umop 3p!sdn My (non-tongue-in-cheek) suggestion is EASSERT - this is an assertion failure that you don't want to abort()/panic() on. Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030514080038.GC4366>