Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:26:04 -0500 From: Louis LeBlanc <FreeBSD@keyslapper.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such as NetBSD!!! Message-ID: <20050211142604.GA1404@keyslapper.net> In-Reply-To: <1023983922.20050211095209@wanadoo.fr> References: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNCEFLFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <200502110316.06495.m.hauber@mchsi.com> <1023983922.20050211095209@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/11/05 09:52 AM, Anthony Atkielski sat at the `puter and typed: > Mike Hauber writes: >=20 > > Heh... This gives me an idea... How about FreeBSD "skins." The > > Beastie as the default (of course), and dis_ey-type themes for=20 > > the "weak in the faith". If FreeBSD's attempt is not to be=20 > > offensive to anyone, anywhere, anytime, then perhaps it just=20 > > needs to jump into a different skin for everybody (corporate or=20 > > otherwise) it serves... Perhaps a questionare to be filled out=20 > > in the beginnings of sysinstall would let the system know what is=20 > > to be considered "appropriate." >=20 > This sort of idea betrays the geek atmosphere that pervades FreeBSD and > many other open-source efforts. It might please geeks installing the > OS, but it only makes it look like a toy to people who are installing it > for serious use. Nobody sitting in a machine room in front of a rack of > servers is going to care anything about "skins." They why would they care *what* the logo is? Those of us that use FreeBSD every day on our desktops for 99.999% of everything we do on a computer of any kind would be more likely to have an opinion. Which should also be obvious by the length of this and at least one other thread on the subject here on questions alone. I haven't even checked on advocacy. I'm just going to say this. I use FreeBSD for EVERYTHING I do until I'm forced to open a word doc someone else will have to edit and see. I know there are alternatives, but they don't seem to have some of the features needed for the stuff I get at work. Regardless, I never had a problem with Beastie. I like him. He is the only mascot/logo/whatever associated with an OS (other than the window) that is actually relevant. What the hell does a penguin have to do with Linux? What does a red hat have to do, except to repeat the name? Even Puffy isn't really relevant except to try to represent the security features -why not an armadillo? Even when I was a "spiritual" and "faithful" Catholic, I never had a problem with Beastie. I know that christians buy Deviled Ham every day, watch the Blue Devils play football or whatever it is they do, and use Red Devil paints and caulking to winterize their houses, and don't think twice, but now Beastie is coming under fire because he's red, has horns and a tail and a fork. Must be Satan. Therefore people that love FreeBSD love Satan. That's logic. I don't think I have the energy to keep posting to this thread. I have other things to deal with. I'm just going to restate my opinion here one last time. There were obviously some assumptions made about the intentions of the core group. Most, if not all were probably wrong. At least about the way they were planning this whole contest. I don't think anyone ever intended to doubt the fact they are genuinely interested in nothing more than spreading FreeBSD and it's welfare. The more people that use it the better appreciated they'll feel. Perfectly reasonable. I suspect that whether they are right or wrong about Beasties impact on the spread is the only issue at hand. Beastie is relevant, he's well liked by those that understand him. There is no good reason to remove him. You want to build a multi faced distribution with "skins", go right ahead. Contrary to the previous post, I don't think I'd really have any problem with it. Just don't remove the beastie images from the distribution, and don't make it a pain in the ass to keep him in the boot screen. I know there will be plenty of people that disagree, but these are my opinions and I'm sticking with them. No, not blindly. Maybe I'm just not business savvy, but I never set out to be. I *have* my reasons for wanting the look of FreeBSD to stay the same, and they're not based on other peoples sensitivities, beliefs or hysteria. Just let me know if the beastie shirts go on sale. I'll stock up. Lou --=20 Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD-at-keyslapper-DOT-net Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) Please send off-list email to: leblanc at keyslapper d.t net Key fingerprint =3D C5E7 4762 F071 CE3B ED51 4FB8 AF85 A2FE 80C8 D9A2 Cahn's Axiom: When all else fails, read the instructions. --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCDMB8r4Wi/oDI2aIRAogxAJoDE5Hfee1CI/8JAv08Na5rYj5Y5ACeN6eH PrmnZD7xY444Piz8k1L4g5c= =lqUB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050211142604.GA1404>