Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:07:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Jan Lentfer <Jan.Lentfer@web.de> Cc: Henk Wevers <henk@wevers.org>, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:28.resolv Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020627150627.9890G-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <1025202594.2815.55.camel@jan-linux.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 Jun 2002, Jan Lentfer wrote: > Am Don, 2002-06-27 um 20.18 schrieb Henk Wevers: > > [...] > > I allready updated apache for an example, only not after the new make > > world again. If i do this i will need to deinstall and reinstall the port. > [...] > > If I understood everything right, apache is ok by just rebuilding the > world since apache is dynamically linked? Am I right? Check the binaries installed by the Apache package using 'file' utility, but yes: our package *should* install dynamically linked binaries, and so a rebuild of world *should* be sufficient. This assumes that your apache package is recent enough that it uses the most recent version of libc. Speaking of which, we probably need to generate updated libc's for the compat libraries... Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020627150627.9890G-100000>