Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 21:27:08 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org>, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Naming of GNOMENG Message-ID: <20020825042708.GB29884@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <1030244738.96870.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20020825022319.GC28878@xor.obsecurity.org> <1030244738.96870.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 11:05:38PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 22:23, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Will you be renaming the GNOMENG framework (bsd.gnomeng.mk, > > USE_GNOMENG) back to GNOME once it's ready to take over? I'm not > > particularly happy with the use of *NG within the Project..it's only > > the Next Generation while under development and ceases being Next the > > moment it's standard, so the name shouldn't persist. Taken to > > extremes we'd have GNOMENGNG for GNOME 3.x :-) >=20 > Yes, the idea is to have GNOMENG stick around only until we've migrated > all the ports. Then, that macro will disappear from all Makefiles. I > meant to add that in the porting guide, and I thought I'd be able to get > it in there tonight before someone asked. Excellent, thanks for assuaging my concerns. Kris --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9aFycWry0BWjoQKURAnGaAKCSmtp96vvYJ8O2IDZRXyi59uFdwACePoFA ijmla4vs1awpZ7aIpY4X1Y0= =Udst -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020825042708.GB29884>