Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 16:00:10 -0700 From: Gary D Kline <kline@thought.org> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: evolution question Message-ID: <20030420230010.GA71168@tao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <1050865589.9550.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <20030420184323.GA70819@tao.thought.org> <1050865589.9550.13.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 03:06:29PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sun, 2003-04-20 at 14:43, Gary D Kline wrote: > > On another FBSD server I installed evolution but cannot > > send mail. A popup reports that sendmail exited with > > status 71: mail not sent. Some test messages are saved > > in my evolution OUTBOX. > > Have you tried sending mail from another [simpler] app (e.g. pine)? > Yep. elm, mail[x], mutt still work. Hmmm! Letme check sendmail... --Okay, that was part of the problem. From my mailserver, the /var/spool/clientmqueue needed to be chmod'd. Now mail from evolution is starting to get across. Now the sendmail err is 67. This time I'll check in the sendmail src... . > > > > I used /var/mail/kline as mhy spool; sendmail for outgoing. > > The thing that gets me is tht on another internal server > > running RH, evolution seems to work fine. > > > > evolution prints errors to stderr on my xterm; if I am missing > > some gnome libraries, that may explain it. > > Indeed it might. > > > > > Can anybody clue me in here? Do I need to be running Gnome or > > KDE for this to work? (I'm using ctwm.) > > No. Evo will work without any WM. You just need to make sure all the > dependencies are there. > > > > > gary > > > > PS: NB: I'm missing (at least) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 on this > > server. Lots of cleanup to do here, so am trying it/evolution > > on my DNS and mail server. > > Okay, sounds like you need to do a portupgrade -fR evolution. This will > sync all your Evo libraries, and might solve your problem. It will > definitely solve the missing library issues. Note, libgmodule-2.0.so.0 > is old. The correct, current version is libgmodule-2.0.so.200. > Thanks for the advice. I'll try and see what happens. ``.200''?? Wow, I'm severely torqued here:-) gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030420230010.GA71168>