Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:33:27 +0200
From:      Volker Stolz <stolz@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
To:        Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/69052: Maintainer-update switch workrave to new gtkmm
Message-ID:  <20040716123327.GN26245@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
In-Reply-To: <1089907279.319.10.camel@heater.rainbow-runner.nl>
References:  <200407151202.i6FC2eIV039480@freefall.freebsd.org> <1089907279.319.10.camel@heater.rainbow-runner.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 15. Jul 2004 um 18:01 CEST schrieb Koop Mast:
> 
> > I don't have any problems with GCC 2 on 4.10. Should I drop the USE_GCC?
> > BTW, I *think* (but am not sure) that dropping the suffix from LIB_DEPENDS
> > should work as well and avoid chasing any bumps the libs make.
> > 
> > Volker
> 
> The suffix of 26 is there to use the libgnomeuimm 2.6.x (x11-
> toolkits/libgnomeuimm26) and dependencies, instead of the old
> libgnomeuimm 2.0.0 (x11-toolkits/libgnomeuimm). 
> 
> The gtkmm26 and gnomemm26 ports are compiled with g++ 3.3 which are not
> compatible with the g++ code produced by gcc 2.95.x. The old gtkmm en
> gnomemm ports can indeed be build with gcc 2.95,x.

You're right, I missed some dependencies.
-- 
http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/stolz/ *** PGP *** S/MIME
Neu! Ändern Sie den Anfangstag Ihrer Woche



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040716123327.GN26245>