Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:04:10 +0200 From: "Jose M Rodriguez" <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: "Eric Anholt" <eta@lclark.edu> Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg metaport Message-ID: <opse3lo8y16abrq7@localhost.redesjm.local> In-Reply-To: <1096476691.16006.1.camel@leguin> References: <opse24zyvr6abrq7@localhost.redesjm.local> <1096476691.16006.1.camel@leguin>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:51:32 -0700, Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 04:03, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: >> After my tests with Xorg ports, I find that x11/xorg install more things >> that the old x11/XFree86-4. >> >> Maybe possible that future Xorgs ports come with options and those >> unusual >> bits take off by default? > > It won't be done with options (if you actually want custom, install it > yourself), but I do plan to make the "whole xorg distibution" separate > from the recommended "xorg bits you probably really want" distribution. Well, hitting good names, maybe even a better way. tanks for your time, -- josemi -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opse3lo8y16abrq7>