Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 21:14:02 -0400 From: Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Gstreamer-plugins splitting ports .. needs testing and feed back ? Message-ID: <0287D8BC-1735-11D9-8817-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> In-Reply-To: <1097023527.79913.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <F0BECB69-166F-11D9-AC42-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> <1097023527.79913.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 5, 2004, at 8:45 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > There's a lot here, and I certainly haven't been through it all. > Besides my earlier request to allow for a way to build all of > gstreamer-plugins in a monolithic way (like we can now) for testing > purposes, I would add that you should include bsd.gstreamer.mk twice in > bsd.port.mk (once during the bsd.port.pre.mk, and once during post). > This way it will work with things like OPTIONS. > > Joe I added the second include bsd.gstreamer.mk to bsd.port.mk not too long ago. When you say we need to be able to build gstreamer-plugins in a monolithic way, Would it be better to add a port say gstreamer-plugins-all, a kind of metaport, not really monolithic but it may work for what we want/need. Or add a "all" to bsd.gstreamer.mk which will build all plugins if USE_GSTREAMER=all is defined this may be useful for some ports. Or add a knob in gstreamer-plugins to build every plugin ? Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0287D8BC-1735-11D9-8817-000A958C81C6>