Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Nov 2004 23:03:49 +0100
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
Cc:        gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: libgsf-gnome will not confirgure because libxml2 isn't linked with libpthread
Message-ID:  <1100469829.8072.143.camel@hood.oook.cz>
In-Reply-To: <1100469700.8108.13.camel@server.mcneil.com>
References:  <1100468476.8108.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> <opshg5nmxy9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <1100469460.8108.10.camel@server.mcneil.com> <1100469700.8108.13.camel@server.mcneil.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-VcuqZ27XX7FhweAUH8hy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sean McNeil p=ED=B9e v ne 14. 11. 2004 v 14:01 -0800:
> Today is a day of replying to myself :-)
>=20
> On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 13:57 -0800, Sean McNeil wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 15:51 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> > > On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:41:16 -0800, Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> wro=
te:
> > >=20
> > > > I found this when doing a complete rebuild of my ports:
> > >=20
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > > % cat /usr/ports/textproc/libxml2/Makefile | grep THREADS
> > > OPTIONS=3D        THREADS "Enable pthread support (MAY BREAK OTHER PO=
RTS!)" =20
> > > off \
> > > .if defined(WITH_THREADS)
> > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > >=20
> > > See that 'MAY BREAK OTHER PORTS!' so is it what you want? Maybe, I sh=
ould =20
> > > change by s/MAY/WILL/g to clear up? :-)
> >=20
> > Thanks, Mezz.  I didn't realize I had selected that option.  I am not
> > sure why it is even there if it breaks ports.  Seems like this is the
> > only one, though, so maybe it can be fixed?  The configure could just
> > link with pthread.  It should be safe either way when just testing the
> > compiler, don't you think?
>=20
> Actually, I think this is an error in libc.so.  There should be a weak
> symbol there for pthread_equal which is missing.

What? pthread symbols in libc? why?!

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

A spoonful of curry, garlic and mustard helps the medicine go down...
and come straight back up again.
  -- JLE on #angband

--=-VcuqZ27XX7FhweAUH8hy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBBl9ZFntdYP8FOsoIRAtWGAKCf48Kjt6uVz5DvBjQrs/Me6+l22gCgvsfz
6FveLV3F7nAO6rZ2H56Hl44=
=qeNy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-VcuqZ27XX7FhweAUH8hy--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1100469829.8072.143.camel>