Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:40:40 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Adam McLaurin <freebsd@irotas.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: net/libnet vs net/libnet-devel Message-ID: <428A1078.3060604@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <1116342038.12591.234323975@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1116297146.4271.234280167@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4289E51A.2030501@mac.com> <1116342038.12591.234323975@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adam McLaurin wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > I suspect that many ports actually depend on net/libnet-devel (e.g., > net-mgmt/ettercap). Sure, newer software or updated versions use libnet-devel. > Is there any precedence to keep the arcane 1.0.x around (maybe > net/libnet-old). That way net/libnet could be 1.1.2.1, and > net/libnet-devel could be 1.1.3. Sounds fine to me, only who does the work? (If you're motivated, you can submit patches.... :-) -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?428A1078.3060604>