Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 18:02:54 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [saturnero@freesbie.org: Weird behaviour of mount_unionfs with executables] Message-ID: <42C87CAE.7080802@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <1120425831.77984.37993.camel@palm> References: <20050703181616.GC89744@cvs.freesbie.org> <42C83643.4010506@samsco.org> <20050703201621.GD89744@cvs.freesbie.org> <1120425831.77984.37993.camel@palm>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephan Uphoff wrote: > I suspect the changes in revision 1.272 of kern_exec.c trigger the > copy operation. > > Looks like you need a noatime option for union_fs. > > Stephan Does this mean that every vnode that gets executed gets dirtied and all its pages resynced to the backing store, or just the inode block? Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42C87CAE.7080802>