Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:35:13 -0700 From: Ben Jencks <ben-freebsd-current@bjencks.net> To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Suspend broken ? Message-ID: <86r7e5uium.fsf@wagner.bjencks.net> In-Reply-To: <1121109394.1330.0.camel@taxman.pepperland> (Stefan Ehmann's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:16:34 %2B0200") References: <42C92DC5.3060101@gddsn.org.cn> <200507091517.57736.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <1120939825.937.11.camel@taxman.pepperland> <200507111101.29623.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <1121109394.1330.0.camel@taxman.pepperland>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 11:01 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Saturday 09 July 2005 04:10 pm, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 15:17 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > > I think you just need to remove the extra { after the if statement on
>> > > line 539 at the end of the line.
>> >
>> > This and changing timer0_max_real_count to timer0_real_max_count made it
>> > compilable.
>> >
>> > But this time the system is immediately very slow (not just after
>> > suspend) and I get this strange error message on startup:
>> >
>> > calcru: runtime went backwards from 68378390 usec to 67512958 usec for
>> > pid 11 (idle: cpu0)
>>
>> I had never set timer0_real_max_count. :( One more time:
>
> This new patch fixes the problem for me.
On a T43p, I had the same problem with the slowdown after resume. This
patch fixes it for me as well.
Thanks,
- --
Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFC0uYUpt3yYclAKVsRArnpAJsFBMgKkGVXiMhnVAzdnw6x4U2AtQCeOkrJ
jErii8PcLAzJqI0gSULZnk4=
=/Ur+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r7e5uium.fsf>