Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 11:20:13 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw <xfb52@dial.pipex.com> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: acpi_thermal on nforce 4 board Message-ID: <4459D55D.1050202@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <1146694389.7471.12.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <20060503180559.863EC45042@ptavv.es.net> <1146694389.7471.12.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pav Lucistnik wrote: >Kevin Oberman p=ED=B9e v st 03. 05. 2006 v 11:05 -0700: > > =20 > >>Now, why does my mbmon work out of the box and you need a small patch? >> =20 >> > >I guess because they used some fancy new variation of the chip. > >And now we're really off topic :) > > =20 > One more small suggestion. Should you send your patch to the creators=20 of mbmon? Or to the port maintainer? Or perhaps file a PR? I'm never=20 sure of the right way to do this, but if you have a new chip revision=20 you can bet others will too. (For all know, my MB with a winbond chip=20 that won't run mbmon has the new revision :-)) Best, --Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4459D55D.1050202>