Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:07:48 +0200 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linuxulator: syscall statfs64 not implemented? Message-ID: <20060821080748.GA14037@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <1156121912.32130.22.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> References: <1156096970.19717.12.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> <20060820204338.GA76869@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <1156121912.32130.22.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:58:32PM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 22:43 +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:02:50PM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > > > Since updating my -CURRENT system circa 16th August I'm getting an error > > > like this when my daily Tivoli backup runs: > > > > > > Aug 20 02:18:50 zappa kernel: linux: pid 768 (dsmc): syscall statfs64 not implemented > > > > > > I don't know whether this is a -CURRENT problem or a problem with > > > linux_base-fc4, but I lean towards the former because the same nightly > > > backup setup I'm running on a 6.1-STABLE system runs without problems. > > > > > > I recall a discussion about merging Linux 2.6 kernel support into HEAD > > > around the time I updated. Could this be related to that? Here is what > > > I have for my Linux compat sysctls: > > > > > > compat.linux.oss_version: 198144 > > > compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 > > > compat.linux.osname: Linux > > > > > > Is anyone else having this "syscall statfs64 not implemented" problem? > > > > yes, everyone. statfs64 syscalls is not implemented. > > > > I might implement if its important and you are willing to test. it should be > > quite trivial but I need the testing. > > I guess I might be missing something subtle, here. Is there some kind > of rewrite-from-scratch of the Linuxulator going on at the moment, > because obviously the statfs64 syscall used to be implemented (until > recently) in the i386 Linux kernel compat code, but now it has vanished? > (Your response above makes it sound like it never was present at all.) the syscall was never presented > Nevertheless, because it seems like statfs64 is vital to having the > Tivoli Storage Manager client work (it just hangs around and the backup > fails without it), then I figure at least I consider it "important" and, > yes, I'd be willing to help test. :-) it seems like very trivial so expect patch today ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060821080748.GA14037>