Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 23:39:33 -0500 From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> To: Michael Belz <mbelz@sky-river.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, frzburn <frzburn@gmail.com> Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? Message-ID: <FE9EF19D-67F9-4BA9-83C2-C2766195D270@ece.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <1172983033.60D83A1@fb8.dngr.org> References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> <1172983033.60D83A1@fb8.dngr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 3, 2007, at 23:37 , Michael W. Belz wrote: > Stick with what has been posted, documented and tried and tested > more importantly your having issues finding solid docs to support > your task...using cvsup you have handbook docs and freebsd diary to > use don't reinvent the wheel Probably a good idea; I'm not planning to switch my installed systems from cvsup any time soon. I hope portsnap and csup will be better documented in the future, though; that whole "cvsup wants modula-3" thing is just a little annoying :) -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FE9EF19D-67F9-4BA9-83C2-C2766195D270>