Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:49:14 -0700 From: Phil Pennock <phil.pennock@globnix.org> To: Tom McLaughlin <tmclaugh@sdf.lonestar.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/pylint location fix Message-ID: <20070403014914.GA1258@redoubt.spodhuis.org> In-Reply-To: <1175561693.1871.99.camel@localhost> References: <20070402221448.GA94907@redoubt.spodhuis.org> <1175561693.1871.99.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-04-02 at 20:54 -0400, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 15:14 -0700, Phil Pennock wrote: > > Port devel/pylint doesn't seem to be well distributed on the > > ftp.CC.freebsd.org mirrors and can't be retrieved from the currently > > defined master; ftp://ftp.logilab.org/pub/pylint/pylint-0.13.1.tar.gz > > results in an FTP error after anonymous authentication: > > 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection. > > > > Change the protocol to http: but leave the host and local path alone and > > the file is retrievable, passing checksum tests.. Given that http is > > generally lighter weight, should MASTER_SITES include the http: variant > > before the ftp one? > It's working fine here. Probably just a temporary glitch in the ftp > service on that machine. I should probably have pointed out that this problem persisted across multiple days. I ignored it the first time that portupgrade failed, pursued it when it persisted. I didn't keep notes (personal box) so don't know which day it first failed. Is there any harm to using the http variant too? Perhaps after the ftp schema item? -Phil
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070403014914.GA1258>