Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:33:42 +0100 From: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it possible that modern wireless card only supports WPA and not WEP or this is a bug in the driver? Message-ID: <47C5F356.3000101@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1204149622.47c5dd76995ba@webmail.rawbw.com> References: <1204146470.47c5d1267ceee@webmail.rawbw.com> <47C5D8F6.20608@errno.com> <1204149622.47c5dd76995ba@webmail.rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Yuri wrote: > Isn't it better to have 2 separate flags in CAPS: for example WEP and WEPHW? > WEP would mean that WEP is supported and WEPHW would mean that it's supported > through hardware. It wouldn't make sense. Flags are used to specify capabilities of the interface, not things provided by the operating system. > > Yuri - -- Pietro Cerutti gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEAREKAAYFAkfF81YACgkQwMJqmJVx946NRQCggHH4abFDjkRObQst1QgXm2Wb UlAAn2Y9B4u9v1o2FYg38txv8VlYjysF =10Nx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47C5F356.3000101>