Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:30:09 +0000 From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> To: gavin@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Lock order reversals using bce in 7.1 Message-ID: <E1LMMrp-0000S9-0I@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> In-Reply-To: <1231756684.59797.1.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You don't want WITNESS_KDB, but WITNESS_SKIPSPIN would probably be > sensible to include. OK, I will take out the WITNESS_KDB. I am reluctant to add in WITNESS_SKIPSPIN though, as I understand it stops witnessing spin locks, is that right ? As the only error message I have ever got out of all fo this explicitly mentioned spinlocks then I'd rather have them monitored. > That's due to WITNESS_KDB and probably unrelated to your problems. OK, will re-do all those tests - and also revert to the correct subject line for this thread (I am not quite sure why I typed a new one, it's a stupid thing to do as it makes it hard to follow). cheers, -pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1LMMrp-0000S9-0I>