Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:43:29 +0900 (JST)
From:      Maho NAKATA <chat95@mac.com>
To:        pav@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        openoffice@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [Fwd: openoffice.org-3.1.0_1 failed on amd64 7]
Message-ID:  <20090622.054329.71120065.chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <1245616491.3201.1.camel@hood.oook.cz>
References:  <1245358318.6815.12.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20090620.055944.71110643.chat95@mac.com> <1245616491.3201.1.camel@hood.oook.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: openoffice.org-3.1.0_1 failed on amd64 7]
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:34:51 +0200

> Maho NAKATA p=ED=B9e v so 20. 06. 2009 v 05:59 +0900:
> =

>> Hi Pav, I don't see why.
>> http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/a.7.200906172=
15451/openoffice.org-3.1.0_1.log
>> it seems to be okay.
>> =

>> Ah - and - you use 8 processors :) Great.
> =

> It seem to be random failure, unfortunately. Perhaps it's not complet=
ely
> parallel job safe.
No it's not. I think I have already pointed out.

> .. Who knows :)
anyway if it is an unknown error, it should be an issue.
There are some build errors only heavily parallel build would reveal.

Thanks
-- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ , http://ja.openoffice.org/ =

   Nakata Maho's PGP public keys: http://accc.riken.jp/maho/maho.pgp.tx=
t



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090622.054329.71120065.chat95>