Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:06:52 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass9573@gmx.com> To: arctic@alkar.net Cc: Gary Gatten <Ggatten@waddell.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [?? Probable Spam] Re: Network card Intel and 802.1P tag Message-ID: <4A79CA3C.9050302@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <1249495034.3092.58.camel@Father> References: <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793F2F9@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> <1249493435.3092.45.camel@Father> <4A79C44D.8040803@gmx.com> <1249495034.3092.58.camel@Father>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrey O.Sokolov wrote: > I tried both variant on both NIC - fxp and em > The result doesn't change ;( You should post to net@ and maybe the maintainer will help you. Include pciconf. >> Perhaps off topic, but why are you interested in priority >> tags, since FreeBSD will silently ignore them? > > I developing QoS-model for big network. > I have casualy found out this problem, when I analyzed the traffic with > different COS-value from various devices. Yes, but at the end of the day FreeBSD will ignore the priority tag. It would be just cosmetic. But, I agree that you should see the correct priority tag. Nikos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A79CA3C.9050302>