Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:44:50 +0100 From: Quentin Schwerkolt <develloper.unix@hotmail.fr> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP2408B6623DED4A6E750E5F284650@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <1330007882.86769.YahooMailRC@web83106.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <4F462189.3040106@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <0A1E870C-9DD4-449C-8ECA-A5642FF71A7E@transactionware.com> <1330007882.86769.YahooMailRC@web83106.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, but I think an IDE that can easily compile projects with clang is not a bad idea. On 02/23/12 15:38, Dan Daley wrote: > The I in IDE stands for Integrated. An IDE is an "editor with more general > niftiness" by definition. Unix can be a development environment, but is not an > IDE. > > Dan. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jan Mikkelsen<janm@transactionware.com> > To: O. Hartmann<ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> > Cc: Current FreeBSD<freebsd-current@freebsd.org> > Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:47:37 AM > Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! > > Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation. > > If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking > for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with more > general niftiness. Visual Slickedit? > > On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even >> for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is >> written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE >> was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated >> version in the ports suited our needs. >> >> Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I >> filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. >> >> I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use >> CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried >> devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of >> configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and >> not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. >> >> devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many >> of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, >> but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD. >> >> Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, >> I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the >> focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks >> is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. >> >> Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm >> also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity >> to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE >> is needed. >> >> Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. >> >> Oliver >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BLU0-SMTP2408B6623DED4A6E750E5F284650>