Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:47:34 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: rmacklem@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Resume broken in 8.3-PRERELEASE Message-ID: <20120227164733.GA12679@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <134870242.175249.1330357669745.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <20120227152238.GA2940@regency.nsu.ru> <134870242.175249.1330357669745.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:47:49AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote: > Yes, I can't think of how r229450 would affect "resume". All it does is > clear the high order bit in an error reply from an NFS server, since that > bit should never be set in an NFS error reply and, if set, it results in > an mbuf list being free'd twice. True, although even if it helps triggering the real underlying bug, it's still weird. > The bit is erroneously set by "amd" sometimes. If you are using "amd", > that might be related to the resume problem? No, I don't; I've deliberately disabled almost everything. > ps: I suspect you saw it, but there was a recent thread related to known > suspend/resume issues and discussed how they might be fixed in the > future. Sorry, I don't remember which list or the exact subject line. Yes, I know what are you talking about. However, I don't recall if any one was experiencing the same symptoms as I do. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120227164733.GA12679>