Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:50:06 -0600 From: Chris Petrik <cpet@sdf.org> To: Waitman Gobble <uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com> Cc: John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnustep group Message-ID: <5146489E.7080906@sdf.org> In-Reply-To: <1363559011.2076@da3m0n8t3r.com> References: <1363559011.2076@da3m0n8t3r.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/17/2013 04:23 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st> wrote .. >> On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote: >>>> Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. >>>> it doesn't work with base clang. >>>> >>>> However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from >>>> svn without issue.. so it really should be a piece of cake to build >>>> some new GNUstep ports.. if there's interest. >>>> Here are my notes so far. >>>> >> FWIW - All the GNUstep ports build fine in DPorts (ports on DragonFly). >> However, the compiler uses is the base compiler, which is GCC 4.7 with >> ObjC built-in. >> >> That would imply setting USE_GCC=4.6+ would "fix" gnustep on ports, no? >> >> John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Maybe it will work, I tried with gcc48. One of the gnustep ports is stuck on trying to build gcc4.2 for some reason.. I don't recall which one at the moment, i think it was base? > I would try the next minimum build which is 4.4 if that works then add in 4.4+ etc.. but i havent messed with it yet.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5146489E.7080906>