Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:53:04 +0200 From: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions re swap-on-zfs Message-ID: <op.w4zx2qfa8527sy@212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl> In-Reply-To: <1381683172518-5851539.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1380880223590-5848720.post@n5.nabble.com> <524EEE40.5060208@gmail.com> <1381060830753-5849397.post@n5.nabble.com> <20131006123350.GJ3287@sludge.elizium.za.net> <op.w4lcd6jp8527sy@212-182-167-131.ip.telfort.nl> <1381683172518-5851539.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:52:52 +0200, Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com> wrote: > Thanks everyone for the assistance and the explanation for why swap "pri" > will not work. > > @Ronald Klop: Wouldn't going through ccd(4) slow the throughput to the > HDD > by reason of extra processing layer? I want to make sure there is close > to > none of performance penalty before implementing. Theoretically yes, but in practice I think you will not notice a difference. You can also use gconcat for about the same effect. Remind that you will loose all swap if one of the concatenated disks fails. Ronald. > > Thanks. > > > > > > ----- > FreeBSD-9.2-stable_amd64_root-on-zfs_clang-only-world > -- > View this message in context: > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Questions-re-swap-on-zfs-tp5848720p5851539.html > Sent from the freebsd-fs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.w4zx2qfa8527sy>