Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:05:57 +0200
From:      Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Solid-run cubox-i or hummingboard
Message-ID:  <20141014030557.GJ38905@cicely7.cicely.de>
In-Reply-To: <1413254341.12052.380.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
References:  <AB2B9628-44A0-4255-98DD-A5B8DC2EF32C@bangj.com> <1413254341.12052.380.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:39:01PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 20:28 -0400, Tom Pusateri wrote:
> > Does anyone have a bootable img for the solid run i.MX6 (armv7) based boards?
> > 
> > The Hummingboard is for sale now on New Egg. It has an mSATA port ($99 model) and gigabit ethernet so it's going to be a fast little board.
> > 
> > I see in the snapshot directories, support for Beaglebone, pandaboard, RPi, and zedboard. I assume none of these will work.
> > 
> 
> We're not yet quite to the point where a generic imx6 kernel can run on
> any board using vendor-supplied fdt data, but it shouldn't be too hard
> to start with the wandboard config and create dts files that describe
> those boards.  The current state of imx6 support is detailed here:
> 
>  https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/arm/imx6

I have the two bigger hummingboards (and a bunch of other iMX6).
In about 2-3 weeks I should have manged to free up enough time to
see if I can boot them.
fdt differences about IO used for SD, console, ... are obvious and
clear.
But what is required at uboot level?

-- 
B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141014030557.GJ38905>