Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:15:28 +0200 From: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Lo=C3=AFc_BLOT?= <loic.blot@unix-experience.fr> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: harder and harder to avoid pkg Message-ID: <CAO%2BPfDdhBeSY=Ti_Jv4x8dbH_g2JHRm39skTTeT3qGYHCJrquA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1476425664.4864.2.camel@unix-experience.fr> References: <638fe078-80db-2492-90be-f1280eb8d445@freebsd.org> <20161012092403.66a41d9e@freedom.alkumuna.eu> <00f3768e-f57a-661c-aa62-89cdf10926bd@netfence.it> <CAO%2BPfDfLtw6OjPvrMC5hzfEL1CH7wyLZ0=RQstqZrRmOmk5pxA@mail.gmail.com> <57FFB185.6030601@quip.cz> <1476425664.4864.2.camel@unix-experience.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2016-10-14 8:14 GMT+02:00 Lo=C3=AFc BLOT <loic.blot@unix-experience.fr>: > FreeBSD ports are complicated ? > Does someone of you tryed to do a Debian package, it's even more > complicated as you should modify many path, split package in multiple > packages, do the service engineering with systemV or systemD, etc ? It's not writing a port that is complicated, it's the whole infrastructure. --=20 Demelier David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAO%2BPfDdhBeSY=Ti_Jv4x8dbH_g2JHRm39skTTeT3qGYHCJrquA>