Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:01:57 +0200 From: Danny Pansters <danny@ricin.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Binary file not executable Message-ID: <200704102201.57775.danny@ricin.com> In-Reply-To: <14989d6e0704101013u515b8c6ag2a1d40816015784@mail.gmail.com> References: <772773.94439.qm@web15906.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> <14989d6e0704101013u515b8c6ag2a1d40816015784@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Op Tuesday 10 April 2007 19:13:04 schreef Christian Walther: > On 10/04/07, h t <th_freebsd@yahoo.com.cn> wrote: > > I'm freebsd beginner > > I Download RealPlayer10GOLD.bin from http://www.real.com/linux/ > > then chmod +x RealPlayer10GOLD.bin > > run > > ./RealPlayer10GOLD.bin > > but broken > > the message is > > > > ELF binary type "0" not known. > > ./RealPlayer10GOLD.bin: Exec format error. Binary file not executable. > > As it says in the URL where you downloaded the Realplayer from, it's > for Linux. But FreeBSD is not Linux. There is a Linux Emulation Layer > available that allows you to execute Linux binaries. You can do a > > # kldload linux > > to enable it. But you'll need to install some additional stuff, > because Linux application will need Linux libraries... > > > How can I do this? > > Not install in port > > Realplayer is in Ports: > > # cd /usr/ports > # make search name=realplayer > Port: linux-realplayer-10.0.8.805.20060718 > Path: /usr/ports/multimedia/linux-realplayer > Info: Linux RealPlayer 10 from RealNetworks > Maint: multimedia@FreeBSD.org > B-deps: > R-deps: linux-atk-1.9.1 linux-expat-1.95.8 linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_6 > linux-glib2-2.6.6 linux-gtk2-2.6.10 linux-jpeg-6b.34 linux-pango-1.8.1 > linux-png-1.2.8_2 linux-tiff-3.7.1 linux-xorg-libs-6.8.2_5 > linux_base-fc-4_9 > WWW: https://player.helixcommunity.org/ > > AFAIK Realplayer GOLD is not freely available, you'll have to pay for it. No, it's the same thing. Same release also. It's just branding. From past experience, I think when Real starts naming a major version "Gold" it more or less means it's slated for obsoleteness (or declared final to phrase it more friendly). They're probably brewing a new release based on helix2. I wonder if it will only support ALSA (like flash9). I don't follow helix development though (its redundant IMHO). Dan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200704102201.57775.danny>