Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:57:24 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, Guy Yur <guyyur@gmail.com>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: if_awg fixes Message-ID: <20170928105724.b76168c5065ebb388b056f51@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <1506561886.31939.16.camel@freebsd.org> References: <CAC67Hz9GzTeKmBfiCsJj=_cC=63gzEeJ7VbwJss4xk_oNLbaDw@mail.gmail.com> <20170928011129.GC86601@home.opsec.eu> <1506561886.31939.16.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 19:24:46 -0600 Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 03:11 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hi! > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I had issues with if_awg when passing heavy traffic > > > (transmission, samba, ...) > > [...] > > >=20 > > > Comparing the driver against if_nfe which also uses a ring buffer, > > > there are several issues with how the rings are programmed. > > > I made changes inspired by it. > > >=20 > > > The following fixes improved the card behavior on my boards. > > > (tested on Orange Pi PC and Orange Pi One) > > Will you submit your patches via https://bugs.freebsd.org ? > >=20 > > Otherwise it's difficult to keep track... > >=20 >=20 > Or as one or more reviews on phabricator, if you're already signed up > there. =A0https://reviews.freebsd.org/differential/ >=20 > -- Ian Yup, reviews.freebsd.org will be the best. I'll try to have a look at those. --=20 Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170928105724.b76168c5065ebb388b056f51>