Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:31:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: nate@yogotech.com Cc: wes@softweyr.com (Wes Peters), chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Connectivity issues (was Re: FreeBSD 4.3-RC5 now on ftp.freebsd.org) Message-ID: <200104232231.PAA11243@usr08.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <15076.22538.844522.228526@nomad.yogotech.com> from "Nate Williams" at Apr 23, 2001 10:27:54 AM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > : That settles it: move the machine to Kansas or Nebraska. 8-) > > > > > > Actaully, Colorado would have better connectivity than either Kansas > > > or Nebraska :-) > > > > The safest place in the USA, seismically speaking, is northwestern > > Missouri. I don't know about their electricity politics, though, > > which is rather important, too. > > Actually, I would have thought that Wisconsin or Minnesota would be more > safe, because of the North American granite plate they're sitting on. > There's no way an earthquate would shake it, since it would be shaking > alot of North America. :) > > Flooding on the other hand seems to be a problem. :) :) Scottsdale, Arizona is statistically safer. That's why the Alcor cryonics facility is located there. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104232231.PAA11243>