Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:15:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Linh Pham <lplist@closedsrc.org> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: <dochawk@psu.edu>, <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: which is faster zip drive under FreeBSD: usb or parallel? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106261514300.26804-100000@q.closedsrc.org> In-Reply-To: <15161.2767.189737.37895@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2001-06-26, Mike Meyer scribbled: # Why not USB for the scanner? While the Iomega SCSI may suck, my Artec # SCSI scanner creates far more problems. I solved them by putting the # scanner, the IOMega and the CDRW on their own bus, but that seems # excessive. At the time, the machine I had didn't have USB, so SCSI was the way to go. Plus I was using Windows NT 4.0 for a long time. Mind you, the USB Zip 250 that I have is for my laptop and the SCSI Zip 250 and scanner are for my desktop. -- Linh Pham [lplist@closedsrc.org] // 404b - Brain not found To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.33.0106261514300.26804-100000>