Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 07:28:08 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org> Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw2 patches for -stable available Message-ID: <20020710072808.B94159@iguana.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <15660.16374.50102.170751@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu>; from daniel%2Bbsd@pelleg.org on Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:08:54AM -0400 References: <20020709023203.A83270@iguana.icir.org> <u2sy9ckpbo1.fsf@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu> <20020709221347.A91104@iguana.icir.org> <15660.2959.142937.827544@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20020710062146.A93900@iguana.icir.org> <15660.16374.50102.170751@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:08:54AM -0400, Dan Pelleg wrote: ... > > In the meantime could you check if removing "keep-state" from > > the limit rules still causes the problem ? > > Removing keep-state seems to solve the problem. Thanks! the good thing is that without a single exception, all the bugs reported so far are responsibility of the userland code, not the kernel :) cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020710072808.B94159>