Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:03:03 +0000 From: Manish Jain <bourne.identity@hotmail.com> To: Erwan DAVID <erwan@rail.eu.org>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: A request to segregate man pages for shell built-ins Message-ID: <VI1PR02MB12005A16022101E37C9C4D00F6440@VI1PR02MB1200.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <15f52853ee8.2787.c09309b3b9b6c7ba483efefa0c51d672@rail.eu.org> References: <VI1PR02MB1200817E0E2CDD2A2A42E1A5F6440@VI1PR02MB1200.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <f88cd63e-3cbc-4463-5219-99d204742b85@FreeBSD.org> <15f52853ee8.2787.c09309b3b9b6c7ba483efefa0c51d672@rail.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/25/17 13:23, Erwan DAVID wrote: > That would mean doing a new section per shell eg (1bash) (1csh) (1zsh) > each shell has its own builtins, Hicham can differ (compare set in bash > and csh ) Perhaps a new, unique section of man pages (something like section 99) implemented for sh only and which can be called by any shell with the same syntax : 'man 99 set' Tx Manish Jain
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?VI1PR02MB12005A16022101E37C9C4D00F6440>