Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:21:14 -0500 From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> To: "maillist ifiaas" <maillist.ifiaas@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TCP payload size and throughput Message-ID: <20070108042114.DDDEB15E235@lawyers.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <161d69110612112007j5d545b33qd18c6b6306f93bca@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=_bOundary Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline > I know there is some relationship between the packet size and the TCP > throughput. But what if two TCP Sack flows have the same MTU size, > but different header size (hence different payload size) ? Is there > any work that model this issue before? Yeah ... the TCP model that Padhye, et.al. worked out in their 1998 SIGCOMM paper shows that performance is directly proportional to packet size. allman --=_bOundary Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFFoca6WyrrWs4yIs4RAgzdAJ97Czx7jfgjtz1O0XYryhr2j+bfbQCff32J 67OocBkmQIpbkMP/iaiwN5Q= =uxUt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_bOundary--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070108042114.DDDEB15E235>