Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 19:00:30 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: George Hartzell <hartzell@kestrel.alerce.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using multiple processors for ports builds and/or portupgrade(1)? Message-ID: <20031012020030.GA71366@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <16264.44449.392345.828078@rosebud.alerce.com> References: <16264.44449.392345.828078@rosebud.alerce.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 06:25:53PM -0700, George Hartzell wrote: >=20 > I have a dual processor machine sitting at a load of 1 during a > "portupgrade -f gnome2". >=20 > Are the Makefiles in the ports trees safe to use with -j 4 or -j 6 on > a dual processor machine? I'm worried about how the dependencies are > handled, etc.... >=20 > If the make is a safe thing to do, is there a standard way to > encourage portupgrade to take advantage of it? In general, I'd be surprised if a significant percentage of ports are -j safe. Kris --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/iLW+Wry0BWjoQKURAowXAJ4myWop9D67LnuXi5aE4aBGEDhG+ACg4wpn cJhxRi3a1bSxqC+c5fKSg4U= =bJFo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031012020030.GA71366>