Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 17:20:40 +0100 From: Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades Message-ID: <40C5E758.5050406@circlesquared.com> In-Reply-To: <16581.57971.324955.793717@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <40C5BCAC.6090401@circlesquared.com> <20040608144433.D31793@unsane.co.uk> <40C5DBD1.5010607@circlesquared.com> <16581.57971.324955.793717@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Huff wrote: >Peter Risdon writes: > > > >> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch sees >> many commits that are likely to be problematic. >> >> > > In general, no. > On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario: >if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some >absolutely critical deadline. > > QED Peter.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40C5E758.5050406>