Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:49:51 -0700 From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cfengine port update? Message-ID: <B09EEE7E-FA16-497F-8F00-A35243CB26CB@netconsonance.com> In-Reply-To: <16B8C91A-13DF-4BFE-B85A-AE193EF12713@netconsonance.com> References: <E0696AEC-8A68-4DAD-842C-05B939D51686@netconsonance.com> <74239915@ipt.ru> <6FD1D7CD-5AD8-45F7-BEDF-8D6CBAEE1D8D@netconsonance.com> <63496920@ipt.ru> <4227E14E-AF2F-47B6-9BA5-D96BE40B05CE@netconsonance.com> <27802537@ipt.ru> <16B8C91A-13DF-4BFE-B85A-AE193EF12713@netconsonance.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
So I pulled a fresh copy of the portsnap for cfengine port -- we are *STILL* on 2.2.3? How many years does it take to get a port updated? > On May 9, 2008, at 12:19 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>> If there's something wrong >>> with them, someone needs to specify what is wrong. >> >> Seems that you shouldn't delete man pages from the Makefile. > > They were removed from the distribution, therefore they weren't > available to install. And I just went through the SVN, and confirmed that the current makefile for the product installs only a single man page. Which is exactly what the port patches I sent you reflect. If you are saying that you'd like me to override the package maintainer and force the installation of man pages which are not installed by default, then you need to state that clearly. (although I disagree in principle with changing the product as delivered by the maintainer without putting those changes into OPTIONS) -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B09EEE7E-FA16-497F-8F00-A35243CB26CB>