Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:49:24 -0400 From: LuMiWa <lumiwa@dismail.de> To: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Deprecation of portsnap, and use of portsnap Message-ID: <20210409174924.5c88f728@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <16a1867d-7bcd-d2b0-954a-c04047606a97@gmail.com> References: <CANR6Wa714iTeTmtW1S3BnoN1-PYgTf%2BkEG4Wf_OJdqH=wzmTzQ@mail.gmail.com> <o7eVTOZAQ7CJJcX5lZZMEyvtUQqcGtdXV02KKaZLLtl-F0pvb8acVD-hQNlFYkzo4nNbQYTdZxAnNnuEjz9XrPwSSy9YsRm5UEJLG-gAocw=@dstev.net> <Iu4M0d0Oy1cXUo9LfR-Fp6ABuDYdElGNAv_zobIpLcBWfhXSzgyDB3xeRdzg9DGsnKWHhe8XjrIhL85afaI0Ohx-SkkrvmP7GsO4u2G5V90=@dstev.net> <ef7dbded-47c4-7eab-8245-869b56f92569@safeport.com> <b63ae7f2-b626-df22-2298-c33303856b90@gmail.com> <CAHu1Y70xc3iKp-Cokb1qWPzzBp06NFjjQZa46Jn-wzUfrP6r1w@mail.gmail.com> <16a1867d-7bcd-d2b0-954a-c04047606a97@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 03:42:48 +0100 Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/04/2021 18:42, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 9:22 AM Graham Perrin > > <grahamperrin@gmail.com <mailto:grahamperrin@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On 07/04/2021 16:02, doug@safeport.com > > <mailto:doug@safeport.com> wrote: > > > > > … I assume EOL for portsnap is in the near future. … > > > > I should not expect deprecation until some time after the final > > RELEASE > > of 12.⋯ reaches end of life. > > > > <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-August/119114.html > > <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-August/119114.html>; > > > > <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-August/119114.html > > <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-August/119114.html>>>; > > > > as a reminder that "… 11.x and 12.x will have it of course, …". > > > > (I have seen some confusion from premature declarations that > > portsnap _is_ deprecated.) > > > > > > in case I'm missing something, or in case this isn't obvious, > > Deprecated does not mean EOL. Deprecated is a declaration that > > usage is discouraged, and that support will be withdrawn in the > > future. In which case, use portsnap is deprecated. > > Yes and no. > > Re: the presence and planned/prospective removal of portsnap, please > see (for example) > <https://forums.FreeBSD.org/threads/ports-transitioned-to-git.79598/post-504229>. > > Re: use of portsnap, > <https://forums.FreeBSD.org/threads/ports-transitioned-to-git.79598/post-504232>. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I decided for retirement of portsnap and choose gitup. I didn't change gitup.conf and just rename my old portsnap /usr/ports made new /usr/ports, run gitup ports and it works than portmaster -ad and everything is updated. -- “We live in a world where there is more and more information, and less and less meaning.” Jean Baudrillard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210409174924.5c88f728>