Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 16:32:21 -0800 (PST) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: jkh@time.cdrom.com Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hmmmm! Now what? Message-ID: <199802040032.QAA01837@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <17118.886521491@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > And what's going to happen when tcl/tk gets updated and are * > incompatible with the previous version again? * * Then anyone using "wish" will simply have to adjust or go to * a more specific invocation of wish. As it stands now, the * ports that invoke "wish" are *completely* broken, so it can't * get much worse than what we have now. :) I'm not talking about people, I'm talking about ports. As it is now, the tree contains ports that were written by people with old tk installations (oh, the horror! ;), and that's the reason why those ports are broken. Anyway, I think Eivind's suggestion solves the problem for both cases. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802040032.QAA01837>